Give up control to gain control

Image by HubSpot via Flickr

Websites have evolved from static brochure-ware to more interactive experiences with video, chat, forums, etc. However, with the new social media platforms, you need to re-think how you design your website to take advantage of the power of these mediums. Just having a Facebook or Twitter badge on your site is not enough. You need to consider these platforms as extensions, if not a discrete part of your website. You also need to treat each platform differently to get the most out of it. Here are some thoughts on how to think about each property:

• LinkedIn: More formal than other social media sites and should be used to promote networking, best practice sharing and industry collaboration. The subgroups are a great way to develop specific topics for discrete groups, such as local user communities.
• Facebook: You should use Facebook to develop conversations with your target market. Think of Facebook as the forum for your customers/prospects to informally interact and collaborate.
• Twitter: Twitter is a "volume" play both from amount of information you should tweet as well as how "loud" you want to be heard in the market. I think of Twitter as a communication platform, where you are sending out messages to people versus interacting with them like you do on Facebook and LinkedIn.

You need to utilize each of these sites to achieve a connection with your customers/prospects. Let's go through a use case with an integrated site that includes your corporate domain coupled with the appropriate social media sites:

Let's use Bestbuy as our use case. I am looking to purchase a new camera. I have been on BB's site and identified a few options. I have read the reviews on the site to better narrow my options.  I now go out to Facebook to seek other experiences and gather feedback on my options. I go to LinkedIn to also see if there is  a camera sub group to ask for feedback. After this due diligence, I have chosen the camera I want but do I need to go back to Bestbuy's site to purchase the camera? If the platforms are integrated, I should be able to buy it where I am at that moment. Frictionless commerce is an old concept but it is more important and more possible today than ever with these social media extensions. But we are not done yet.

To add to the complexity you also need to add in mobile as a potential platform. Say Bestbuy has my mobile information from our interactions on the website. My phone sounds and it is from Bestbuy telling me  I am right near a Bestbuy and here is a coupon for 10% off in the store for the camera I want to buy. Ask for Jim if you go to the store or you can purchase it now with the credit card we have on file. Friction? Not so much. And that is the point; your corporate domain is no longer the place to go to purchase something. I am not coming to you - if you want my business you be where I am. And that is the potential with these platforms if you use them correctly.

Extension. Placement. Location. Timing. Sales.

It took how many users for Facebook to become cash flow positive?

Image via Wikipedia

Facebook recently announced two significant milestones:

• They crossed 300 million users worldwide
• They are now cash flow positive (they were EBIDTA positive).

Given the size of the network, it amazes me that it took that many users for them to become cash flow positive. There have been many discussions about how Facebook needs to discover new ways to monetize their base but having to get to 300m users to become CF positive is mind boggling.Granted the following shows their extreme cost structure:

From Techcrunch: The company is likely spending well over a $1 million per month on electricity alone, say experts we’ve spoken with. Bandwidth is likely another $500,000 or more per month on top of that. The company has earmarked $100 million to buy 50,000 servers this year and next. And sources say they’ve been buying one NetApp 3070 storage system per week (me: like to be that sales rep) just to keep up with all this user generated content. At up to $2 million each, that adds up quickly – we’ve heard estimates that they may have spent as much as $30 million this year alone with the company. And the icing on the cake – earmark another $15 million per year in office and datacenter rent payments.

One of the difficulties cited to becoming CF positive was the huge amount of photos that are uploaded and stored on Facebook. However, I do not see the growth in uploads of pictures decreasing any time soon so how do they continue to scale (even with Haystack) and have the corresponding revenues to stay positive? What if utilization rates of users drop off making it harder to attract advertising (already limited). How do they keep adding people and keep up usage? How do they generate more revenue/user? It will be interesting to watch. Any one else have any thoughts?

Related articles by Zemanta

• Bret Taylor: Facebook Crosses 300 Million Users. Oh Yeah, And Their Cash Flow Just Went Positive (techcrunch.com)

Less with less vs. more with more

Image via Wikipedia

I heard someone say "less with less" is the new mantra of the day and that people now really have to do less with less at work. Less money,time,people,energy,you name it. Does this mean you should do less marketing however? I believe that this downturn is going to really show the value of web 2.0 and the associated social networking tools and services.

Web 2.0 tools now allow you to get even closer to your customer at minimal cost. Set your blog up to let your customers know what you are up to and also shed some light into the struggles that your own organization is experiencing. Set up FaceBook pages and start/join groups on Linkedin. Start to interact with peers to see how and what they are doing with less. The key is to become more open, more public, not secretive or go into bunker mentality and "ride it out." Everyone is in the same boat and looking for help and advice. The power of the network allows you to turn less with less into more with more.